http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11617091

The artical “Italian seaside town planning miniskirt ban” said that a seaside city in Italy is planning to ban miniskirts and other revealing clothing to improve what the mayor calls “standards of public decency”.
This event makes me think two things. The first one is, even in Italy, the country which is considered as the most fashionable and open, has those people who propose such stereotype draft resolutions. This country leads the currency of fashion worldwide and there people are considered as those who are the most care their exterior in this world. It goes by Gucci, Faralli and wine which represent sexy, enjoyable and unique. Simultaneously, I will think that its rules tend to be open and loose. On the contrast, they are planning to ban miniskirts. It really shocked me and I will discuss the reasons which provided by those rulers in next paragraphs.
“Rowdy, unruly or simply badly behaved” is the definition by one of the officials who is involved this proposal for those who wear miniskirts. This definition is not reasonable because not all of those who wear miniskirts are “rowdy, unruly or simply badly behaved”. Although some of them are really bad-behaved, but there are much more people who are worse-behaved do not wear miniskirts. Provided this definition is cogent, so next what will they ban? Those who pierce 2+ holes?
On the second part, I would like to argue for females with the rights of their wearing. Nowadays, people have the right to choose their favour dressing(except those who have special religious). People `s self-conscious are increasing and they are increasingly aware of such things like who they are or how do other people regard as me. Therefore they pay increasingly attentions on their wearing. So, banning for miniskirt can be regarded a controlling of human `s self-conscious and especially for females because males do not wear miniskirt. Everyone knows that women have been suffering for centuries until recent years: they started to have right to vote, started to have chance to work ... of course, they started to own the right to wear what they like. Definitely, this ban are trying to break this tendency. It can be thought as kind of return stroke of the rising of the female conscious.
I think it is ridiculous, what do you think?